### Squared birthdays (and cubed, and more)

On Tori's 3rd birthday, I will be 36 and Lance will be 6.  This results in the following weirdness:

1) Lance will be the exact square root of my age (admittedly Tori's birthday has nothing to do with this)
2) Tori's age will be one of the factors of both Lance's and my age.
3) Tori and Lance's ages when written down in inverse numerical order will be 36.

This further validates my point of having a BIG ASS party for my 36th and Lance's 6th birthday, if only because it's the kickoff to one of the few years that all of our ages will have any sort of mathematical significance to each other (although I guess technically relation #3 is numerology, not math).

Interestingly, the ages required for being the square of a child's age (with reasonableness) are small.  Starting at expected puberty the parent must be one of these ages:
12,20,30,42,56,72

Which would make the child's age at the time of squaring be:
4,5,6,7,8,9

I question 72, but given the number of trophy wives out there, I suppose it's on the very edge of reasonable values.  In another 10 or 15 years, I suppose 90 (child 10 years old) might be there as well.

For CUBES of a child's age, you get only two possibles (parent's age at child's birth/child's age): 25/3,60/4

4th powers gives you: 18/2,81/3
5th gives you: 30/2
6th: 62/2
7th: no possible dates

Note that the only overlap is at 30.  Which means I missed a celebration chance already.  I KNEW I should have worked this math out earlier.  I honest-to-god am upset that I missed the first one.

### My Thesis begins, maybe

It turns out that no single person really knows how to do a thesis at Texas State University, at least in the CS department. I spent 3 hours Monday going from one end of campus to the other moving paper around. Hopefully this is not a harbinger of things to come.

### Lounging Lizards

We had an active weekend last week. We traded some time off with Jana during the week for a Saturday evening and went to see the Austin Lounge Lizards' 25th anniversary show at the Texas Union Ballroom. A nice time was had, although I still feel like I violated for the service charge the Texas Box Office charged. But I digress.

Sunday was a book signing at Book People for Alton Brown's new book I'm Just Here for More Food. I like Alton quite a bit, but Book People really screwed up this signing. First, they didn't allow signings of books not purchased at Book People. While I can understand this, I've spent many dollars at Book People, and I think they can let at least one book slide. Second, there wasn't enouhgh space to hold the crowd. There were people in line to the door for signing, and unless you really worked at it, you couldn't get close enough to the stairwell (he was upstairs) to hear him speak. In the past (and for speakers I hadn't heard of), they've piped the speaker to the PA system so everyone could hear the speaker. Not this time. Everyone was just screwed.

Oh well. He'll be around again, I'm sure.

View this post on my blog

### Sh!

Amber got me these wonderful earphones for christmas. They block 15-35 dB of sound from the outside world, depending on how far you're willing to shove them in your ears. To give you an idea of sound reduction, the earplugs they use at construction sites do about 12dB.

At any rate, I never noticed houw LOUD the office is. I mean, I knew it was loud before, but it took the almost complete silence of the earphones to point it out. It's amazing.

Thanks Amber!

View this post on my blog

### YES! It's like christmass, but with better food!

Alton Brown has a sequel to his book (I'm Just Here for the Food) called I'm Just Here for More Food. If you're inclined to buy me a gift, this would be the one to get me.

Alton's on tour promoting the new book, so I checked his touring schedule. What should I find?

AUSTIN

Sunday, January 30, 3:00 PM
Book People
603 N. Lamar
Austin, TX 78703

Guess where I'm going to be on Jan 30?

View this post on my blog

I somehow pulled off an 'A' in my Formal Languages class. How that happened, I'm not sure. Maybe the chicken sacrifice at midnight under the full moon helped.

At any rate, I now have only one more "real" class to take, then a couple thesis classes, then I've officially got a Master's! Yeah! Double bonus: work pays 100% of the cost!

Triple bonus: My grade point is high enough to seriously consider some of the bigger CS schools for PhD work. Yeah. In like 15 years.

View this post on my blog

### On language and dialect

I stumbled on an interesting page that goes into incredible detail on German and the evolution of german grammar and pronunciation. On the difference between a dialect and a language, it has this to say:

There is no linguistic criterion to distinguish a dialect from a language. A dialect is a language if it is treated as such in a particular country. Or, as Max Weinreich put it: "A language is a dialect with an army and a navy."

Cute.

In other news, my company is buying a company that does software devlopment in Austria. So maybe I'll be able to get transferred over there. Woot!

View this post on my blog

### Math/Computer humour

It's finals time, and you know what that means: avoiding studying!

While looking up information on the pumping lemma (if your masochistic, do a google search), I landed upon this little gem. Amazingly enough, it explains the pumping lemma very well, and in rhyming couplets, no less.

No back to your regularly scheduled, non-math-related, blogging.

View this post on my blog

• Current Mood
tired

### Wikipedia and document evolution

First, the professional encyclpediast's view of Wikipedia.

Now, some commentary. I understand where Mr. McHenry is coming from. I even agree with him to an extent, if only the point he makes in his final paragraph: as a document is editted more and more times, its quality will move not towards perfection, but towards average. But it's more than that. The document moves to the average of the group editting it. If the group of people editting the document is your average internet user of today, you'll end up with a document that is only slightly more intelligent than the average person. Why? Because the average person on the internet is slightly-above average in intelligence and writing ability.

But the reverse is true. If the group of editors consists of intelligent experts in a subject, the quality of edits will move the document towards perfection. This applies not just to wikis, but to any edited endeavour. Consider textbook production (hi Amber!). If the editors of textbooks were just pulled at random off the street, our textbooks would be in a bad state. But that's not what happens. Editors are "carefully" chosen to be bright, interested, and experts. As such, textbooks aproach perfection. Naturally, there are errors in textbooks. But the errors are small, and usually not consequential to the overall subject.

Enough rambling. Back to my documentation.

By the way -- my current music entry is orignally by Dire Straits. Their version is better (although Indigo Girls' version isn't bad either).

View this post on my blog

• Current Music
Indigo Girls - Romeo and Juliet

### Funny weather forcasters

One of my many low-grade hobbies is watching weather. I'm interested in weather like a kid. I don't really want to know all the terms and be able to make my own forcasts and all that (other than where that might match my higher-grade gadget hobby); it's more of a, "Cool!" hobby.

At any rate, I read the daily forcasts from NOAA often enough that I kind of have a feel for the forcasters. So it was with some suprise that I read this on today's forcast:

THE LACK OF A DISTINT MESOSCALE VORTEX FROM THE EASTWARD MOVING
THUNDERSTORM COMPLEX SHOULD ALLOW FOR A FASTER RESPONSE TO THIS
HEATING WITH SATELLITE IMAGERY AND THE "LOOKING-OUT-THE-WINDOW" MODEL
INDICATES EXCELLENT INSOLATION FOR THIS AFTERNOON. HIGHEST AFTERNOON
POPS ARE THEREFORE OVER CENTRAL SECTIONS.

It helps to understand that NOAA uses a dozen or so different forcasting models along with some common sense to come up with their forcast for a period. So this "looking-out-the-window" model is funny.

View this post on my blog